March 21 - 5 of Wands
Conflict, here represented by one of the OG weirdos William Blake.
An eternal topic for me is, of course, the role of art amidst culture, politics, and technology... a term, starting in part with the romantics, that expresses such an absolute alliance to autonomy and hostility to use-value that it inevitably attracts conflict-- about what it should do, should mean, whether it's irredeemably individualistic or wasteful to pursue...
I have to wrestle with these questions and resistances to be able to express my own values. Again the Adorno idea-- if everything can be known empirically/materially, then why doesn't knowledge have a philosopher's stone like power to persuade and enact change? Do we just sit on our hands and say the world "should" do as we say? Or do we have to consider that our enlightenment may seem just as naive and wrongheaded as beliefs and actions throughout the enlightenment of the 1700s seem to us now? How do we get in touch with what we don't even know we don't know?
I guess that's my personal justification for art that surprises me, expresses something at once alien but clarifying... it puts me back in my place.